Sidelined children's health official says EPA inaction means "kids are disposable"
Making sure children are protected from environmental toxins has been Dr. Ruth Etzel’s job at the Environmental Protection Agency. She’s the agency’s top pediatric expert – the author of textbooks and policy handbooks on children’s environmental health. As director of the Office of Children’s Health Protection (OCHP), it was her job to determine the impacts of regulations on children.
“I often think of the Office of Children’s Health as the conscience of EPA, because, you know, we’re kind of nagging at them: ‘Is this okay for children? Are you sure this is okay for children?’” she told correspondent Anna Werner.
But from the beginning of the Trump administration, Dr. Etzel says it seemed those above her no longer wanted her advice. “Our message is no longer welcome. The message that children are not little adults and they need special protections is not welcome,” she said.
Her monthly meetings to advise the EPA administrator were abruptly halted.
“So, you had no one-on-one meetings with Scott Pruitt, and you had no one-on-one meetings with Andrew Wheeler? Not one?” asked Werner.
And, she says, a national strategy to remove lead from children’s environments – launched after the Flint, Michigan water crisis – stalled, with one official brought in by the new administration telling her that anything involving new regulation “wouldn’t fly.”
“My sense is that the government has absolutely no intention of taking any action toward seriously changing lead in children’s environments,” Dr. Etzel said.
Werner asked, “What does that mean for the kids?”
“It basically means that our kids will continue to be poisoned,” Dr. Etzel replied. “It basically means that kids are disposable, they don’t matter.”
But through it all, she says, she kept pushing, until about three weeks ago, when an official came into her office: “My boss, who’s the deputy chief of staff, walked in and handed me a piece of paper and said, ‘I’m putting you on administrative leave.’ And I almost fell off of my chair. I said, ‘What’s this about?’ And she wouldn’t say.”
“Did you have any idea what was happening or why it was happening?” Werner asked.
“Did you have any warning?”
“No. No. Nothing.”
Health and environmental experts who know Dr. Etzel were shocked and stunned over her being put on leave. In a letter to EPA, over 120 environmental and health organizations express their great concern, saying “by placing Dr. Etzel on leave, the EPA has sent a signal that children’s health is not a priority for the agency.”
So, at a meeting last week, Werner approached acting deputy chief of staff Helena Wooden-Aguilar, the person Dr. Etzel says came into her office that day.
“Why was she not told the reasons why she was put on leave?” Werner asked.
“Unfortunately, I can’t comment on that,” Wooden-Aguilar responded.
So, Werner asked her boss, chief of operations Henry Darwin, the man right under administrator Andrew Wheeler.
“So, it’s really inappropriate for me to talk about any personnel-related issues,” Darwin said.
“Okay, but why is Dr. Etzel on administrative leave?”
“Like I just said, it’s very inappropriate for me to talk about personnel issues.”
“But shouldn’t she have been told why she was put on administrative leave?”
“You want me to say it again? I really can’t comment on personnel-related issues,” Darwin said.
As for Dr. Etzel? After three weeks on paid leave, she says it’s time to speak out.
“This is totally wrong, and the only people that I really report to are mothers and fathers and communities in the United States,” Dr. Etzel said. “And if EPA won’t let me tell about how children are being poisoned, I’ll just tell the mothers and fathers directly. I have that right, whether or not EPA wants me on their staff.”
Werner asked, “What if they come up later and say, ‘Well, you did these things wrong?”
“If I did, then I’ll say, ‘Okay.’ If I didn’t, then I’ll say I didn’t. You know? But I don’t know what the allegation is, so it’s very hard to know, but basically I’m a straight shooter, I’m transparent. So if I make a mistake, I own it.”
The EPA referred CBS News to a statement from chief of staff Ryan Jackson, who said that Dr. Etzel “was placed on leave to give the agency the opportunity to review allegations about the director’s leadership of the office.”
But Dr. Etzel tells us she has never been made aware of any allegations.
The EPA insists it is committed to protecting children and maintains that Dr. Etzel’s removal won’t affect its work.
In a statement to CBS News, EPA Chief of Staff Ryan Jackson said,
“Although EPA does not customarily comment on personnel matters, due to circulating misinformation, the Director of EPA’s Office of Children’s Health Protection was placed on leave to give the Agency the opportunity to review allegations about the Director’s leadership of the office.”
A spokesperson for the Office of Children’s Heath Protection also issued a statement:
“Children’s health is and has always been a top priority for the Trump Administration and the EPA in particular is focused on reducing lead exposure in schools, providing funds for a cleaner school bus fleet, and cleaning up toxic sites so that children have safe environments to learn and play. These are just a few of the dozens of objectives the EPA’s Office of Children’s Health will continue work on during this administration.”
The EPA also provided press releases (1, 2, 3) asserting the agency’s commitment to protecting children’s health.
After this story aired Monday morning, EPA spokesman John Konkus sent the following updated statement:
“Dr. Etzel is currently on investigative leave because of serious reports made against her by staff regarding her ability to effectively lead the Office of Children’s Health. The kinds of allegations that have been raised regarding Dr. Etzel’s conduct are very concerning and prompted EPA to take action. Her attempt to use the press to distract from the allegations about her personal conduct is completely inappropriate. Any link that Dr. Etzel is attempting to draw between her personal situation and the mission of the Office of Children’s Health is an attempt at misdirection. EPA is 100% committed to protecting children’s health and will do everything in its power to ensure that the Office has competent leadership.”
In response, Dr. Ruth Etzel wrote the following:
“This is false. I want to respond to the EPA spokesperson’s allegations about me. I have nothing to hide. For the years 2016 and 2017 I was given ‘Commendable’ performance ratings from my EPA supervisors. In April of 2018 I had a mid-year performance review with the Acting Deputy Chief of Staff and she brought no problems to my attention. EPA gave me a $2,200 cash award in August of 2018 for my leadership on drafting the Federal Strategy to Reduce Childhood Lead Exposures and Associated Health Impacts.
My end-of-year performance review was scheduled to take place this month but instead of doing a performance review EPA unexpectedly placed me on administrative leave. The federal government has well-established procedures to handle employee complaints. The specific complaint must be brought to the attention of the individual within a clearly specified timeframe so that she has the opportunity to respond. My EPA supervisors have not brought any complaint to my attention.
For the past 5 months, the EPA leadership appeared to be desperate to find something that I had done wrong. They tormented my travel coordinator and quizzed the person who handles our grants. Apparently they could not find anything so EPA put me on paid leave for no reason. Now, EPA is slandering me in the press, because I am telling the public the truth.”